[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160715014237.GC5791@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:42:37 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] uio: allow use on nommu systems
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 08:53:06PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> mmap of uio devices does not seem to work without further
> nommu-specific support, but interrupt handling already works, and
> userspace drivers for nommu systems can simply use physical mmio
> addresses from userspace directly anyway without mmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
> ---
>
> I don't particularly expect this to be accepted upstream as-is, but
> since we're actually trying to use the UIO subsystem on nommu (J2),
> I'd like to start a discussion of what an acceptable patch would
> entail.
>
> The uio_pdrv_genirq driver was tested on J2 with this patch and
> interrupt handling works as expected.
>
> drivers/uio/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/Kconfig b/drivers/uio/Kconfig
> index 52c98ce..387b2bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/uio/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
> menuconfig UIO
> tristate "Userspace I/O drivers"
> - depends on MMU
This doesn't seem to do much, don't you need to modify uio-specific
drivers? Or given that the core uio code doesn't rely on mmu, is this
safe?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists