[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <42a51a92-29ac-7ba4-66fb-034f46e90d8e@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:39:29 -0400
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: Use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for
built-in or module
Hello Paul,
On 07/14/2016 06:06 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think it's a reasonable patch and I'm at that point in the day where
> I'm looking for distractions so I just added it to the selinux#next
> queue; once the merge window closes I'll rotate this into my next
> branch.
>
Great, thanks a lot for your help.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists