[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160715123253.GB2620@tetsubishi>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:32:54 +0900
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, July 15, 2016 12:28:53 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:17:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I think, but it needs more work - see below) and can
> >
> > For a start, it generates this warning, now:
> >
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c:269:20: warning: 'i2c_acpi_add_device' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > static acpi_status i2c_acpi_add_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 level,
> > ^
>
> OK, thanks for the heads-up.
Yes, thanks!
>
> Wolfram, what about if I exposed my "acpi-tables" branch for you to pull?
>
> You could resolve this in your tree then.
I can pull it in, sure. For the fixup, I'd like a commitment from one of
the ACPI experts (Jarkko, Mika, Andy), though. Otherwise I'd need to
revert given that we are quite late in the cycle already.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists