linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Introduce bias knob

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160715134523.GB28589@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:45:24 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, dimitrysh@...gle.com, romlem@...gle.com,
	ccross@...gle.com, tkjos@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Introduce bias knob

On 07/15, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:27:09PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Heh ;) I too think it should be renamed. I'd suggest
> >
> > 	__rcu_sync_enter(rss);
> >
> > although I do not really mind and agree with any name.
>
> Hmmm...  Why not just move the checks out into the caller?  That
> would make the intent much more clear.

Hmm. which caller?

Oleg.