[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160715150352.GB5136@tetsubishi>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 00:03:52 +0900
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
GregKH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 05/14] eeprom: at24: hide the read/write loop
behind a macro
> >> +#define loop_until_timeout(tout, op_time) \
> >> + for (tout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout), \
> >> + op_time = jiffies; \
> >> + time_before(op_time, tout); \
> >> + usleep_range(1000, 1500), op_time = jiffies)
> >
> > There is one subtle change coming with this change: the do-while loop is
> > guaranteed to run at least once while the for-loop doesn't.
> >
>
> While it's technically possible, it will never happen as long as
> write_timeout is set to some sensible value.
I know that. I prefer Linux to be rock-stable, though, even when
slightly misconfigured (or under extreme load for that matter). An
incremental patch would be enough, no need to resend.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists