[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160715155408.GE8644@bbox>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 00:54:08 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm, vmscan: Update all zone LRU sizes before
updating memcg
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:09:25PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Minchan Kim reported setting the following warning on a 32-bit system
> although it can affect 64-bit systems.
>
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 1322 at mm/memcontrol.c:998 mem_cgroup_update_lru_size+0x103/0x110
> mem_cgroup_update_lru_size(f44b4000, 1, -7): zid 1 lru_size 1 but empty
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 4 PID: 1322 Comm: cp Not tainted 4.7.0-rc4-mm1+ #143
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> 00000086 00000086 c2bc5a10 db3e4a97 c2bc5a54 db9d4025 c2bc5a40 db07b82a
> db9d0594 c2bc5a70 0000052a db9d4025 000003e6 db208463 000003e6 00000001
> f44b4000 00000001 c2bc5a5c db07b88b 00000009 00000000 c2bc5a54 db9d0594
> Call Trace:
> [<db3e4a97>] dump_stack+0x76/0xaf
> [<db07b82a>] __warn+0xea/0x110
> [<db208463>] ? mem_cgroup_update_lru_size+0x103/0x110
> [<db07b88b>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3b/0x40
> [<db208463>] mem_cgroup_update_lru_size+0x103/0x110
> [<db1b52a2>] isolate_lru_pages.isra.61+0x2e2/0x360
> [<db1b6ffc>] shrink_active_list+0xac/0x2a0
> [<db3f136e>] ? __delay+0xe/0x10
> [<db1b772c>] shrink_node_memcg+0x53c/0x7a0
> [<db1b7a3b>] shrink_node+0xab/0x2a0
> [<db1b7cf6>] do_try_to_free_pages+0xc6/0x390
> [<db1b8205>] try_to_free_pages+0x245/0x590
>
> LRU list contents and counts are updated separately. Counts are updated
> before pages are added to the LRU and updated after pages are removed.
> The warning above is from a check in mem_cgroup_update_lru_size that
> ensures that list sizes of zero are empty.
>
> The problem is that node-lru needs to account for highmem pages if
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM is set. One impact of the implementation is that the
> sizes are updated in multiple passes when pages from multiple zones were
> isolated. This happens whether HIGHMEM is set or not. When multiple zones
> are isolated, it's possible for a debugging check in memcg to be tripped.
>
> This patch forces all the zone counts to be updated before the memcg
> function is called.
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists