linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 0/4] pwm: add support for ChromeOS EC PWM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1468625324-41229-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:28:40 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
	Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
	Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
	Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@...omium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] pwm: add support for ChromeOS EC PWM

Hi,

This is the 4th (and final?) version of my series to support the new ChromeOS
EC PWM API, so we can control, e.g., a PWM backlight when its PWM is attached
to the EC. It uses Boris's latest "atomic" hooks for the PWM API (i.e., the
->apply() callback), which were recently merged.

Pulled and adapted the cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status() helper from this patch, with
some minor modifications:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/12/342

Note that after some style bikeshedding, I proposed to put off rewriting the
entire cros_ec_commands.h header at the moment, due to the shared nature of
this file. Follow up here:

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=621123

As this touches MFD (sort of), drivers/platform/chrome/, and drivers/pwm/, I'm
still not sure who it should all go through: Lee, Thierry, or Olof?

Please review.

Regards,
Brian

Change log (also documented in each patch):

v4:
 * return -EPROTO in cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(), instead of (-EECRESULT - FOO)
 * log EC error results with dev_dbg()

v3:
 * fix some int->hex
 * fix a small bug in the handling of 'disabled' vs. 'duty_cycle == 0'
 * collect acks, tested-by

v2:
 * drop the "google,max-pwms" property
 * separate the cros_ec vs. PWM abstractions a little more clearly in the driver
 * remove dynamic kzalloc()'s and rely on on-stack memory instead



Brian Norris (3):
  mfd: cros_ec: add EC_PWM function definitions
  doc: dt: pwm: add binding for ChromeOS EC PWM
  pwm: add ChromeOS EC PWM driver

Tomeu Vizoso (1):
  mfd: cros_ec: Add cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status helper

 .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.txt |  23 ++
 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c            |  17 ++
 drivers/pwm/Kconfig                                |   7 +
 drivers/pwm/Makefile                               |   1 +
 drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c                          | 260 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h                        |  15 ++
 include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h               |  31 +++
 7 files changed, 354 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/google,cros-ec-pwm.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c

-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020