[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160716003209.GC76613@google.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:32:09 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: potential NULL dereference
+ stable
Hi Dan,
Patch looks good, but one question.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 02:06:30PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We check for NULL but then dereference "info->mtd" on the next line.
>
> Fixes: 72169755cf36 ('mtd: maps: sa1100-flash: show parent device in sysfs')
What am I supposed to do about tags like this? It appears that the
-stable folks have started taking patches with a 'Fixes' tag alone [0],
even though that's not mentioned in [1]. I ask because I strongly
suspect this patch doesn't fit the rules in [1] -- it quite likely has
only been compile tested; and it qualifies quite well as violating
bullet 4:
"""
- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing).
"""
So, I'd like to keep the tag, but I'd like to avoid having to NAK it in
the stable review process. (And really, I often don't care enough to
even do that. I believe there's a very low chance that something like
this would cause additional problems more than the original bug.)
Regards,
Brian
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/sa1100-flash.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/sa1100-flash.c
> index 142fc3d..784c6e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/sa1100-flash.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/sa1100-flash.c
> @@ -230,8 +230,10 @@ static struct sa_info *sa1100_setup_mtd(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> info->mtd = mtd_concat_create(cdev, info->num_subdev,
> plat->name);
> - if (info->mtd == NULL)
> + if (info->mtd == NULL) {
> ret = -ENXIO;
> + goto err;
> + }
> }
> info->mtd->dev.parent = &pdev->dev;
>
[0] I haven't tried to prove that all patches with 'Fixes' tags go to
the -stable queue, but I know at least that this commit:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3b5394a3ccffbfa1d1d448d48742853a862822c4
ended up in v4.5.y here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=800a0b8a973b4262c92c228043cd17455cdf1a15
and IIRC, there are plenty more like that.
[1] Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists