[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1607219.k0v9zRxBvM@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 02:51:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 04:04:46 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> _PTS/_WAK may contain EC transactions, it is better to have them handled
> with IRQ enabled. This patch moves the 2 suspend PM ops from noirq stage
> to late/early stage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
There are systems that won't work with this patch applied, so I don't
see a point in applying the other two.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index d30fce7f..c5c374c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -595,9 +595,10 @@ static int acpi_suspend_state_valid(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops = {
> .valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
> .begin = acpi_suspend_begin,
> - .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_prepare,
> + .prepare_late = __acpi_pm_prepare,
> + .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
> .enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
> - .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
> + .finish_early = acpi_pm_finish,
> .end = acpi_pm_end,
> };
>
>
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists