linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 6/9] vfio: platform: call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jul 2016 21:09:33 -0400
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
	jcm@...hat.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 6/9] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI

On 7/14/2016 6:04 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> +static inline
>> > +bool vfio_platform_acpi_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
>> > +{
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> > +	struct device *dev = vdev->device;
>> > +	acpi_handle handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
>> > +
>> > +	return acpi_has_method(handle, "_RST");
>> > +#else
>> > +	return false;
>> > +#endif
>> > +}
> What exactly is the rationale for making these inline?  Clearly reset
> is not a performance relevant path.  Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> 

It is remaining from the previous stub functions which were inline. I'll get rid
of the inlines.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.