[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASny6C=TmVX4uRvf1kF4pNF_ovQQgw9UEhR=xLn+Fy2Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:57:51 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Jay Sternberg <jay.e.sternberg@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: probe common clock drivers earlier
2016-07-16 11:11 GMT+09:00 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>:
> Quoting Masahiro Yamada (2016-05-05 00:57:17)
>> Several SoCs implement platform drivers for clocks rather than
>> CLK_OF_DECLARE(). Clocks should come earlier because they are
>> prerequisites for many of other drivers. It will help to mitigate
>> EPROBE_DEFER issues.
>>
>> Also, drop the comment since it does not look valuable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
Thanks for taking a look at this patch.
While I was wondering where is the best place for
"obj-y += clk/", I thought it can be probed even earlier.
So, v2 is here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9129749/
Please consider it as a applicable candidate.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists