linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160718110227.6ff6d1a2.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:02:27 +0200
From:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Radim Kr??m???? <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio: Basic implementation of virtio pstore
 driver

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:29:55 +0900
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:37:39 +0900
> > Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:

> > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER    2
> > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_BUFSIZE  (4096 << VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER)
> > 
> > It may make sense to make the size of the buffer configurable through
> > the config space.
> 
> Right.  I'm considering it too, but it needs a buffer larger than
> kmsg_bytes (= 10K) to work properly in the current implementation.  As
> this version is just to verify the idea is sane and useful, I used a
> fixed size buffer.  Will change in the next version.

Sure, that makes sense for a prototype. We can guard any config space
entry with a feature bit, but this one makes sense to add from the
beginning.

> > Speaking of the standard: I think it makes sense to at least reserve a
> > device id for pstore, as the idea is sound. Maybe prepare a patch to
> > the standard as well if you have time?
> 
> I'd love to.  As I mentioned earlier, I don't have enough knowledge in
> this area.  Could you please provide some links about how can I do that?

See the virtio page at OASIS
(https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=virtio)
for a link to our subversion (yes...) repository. Just do two patches:
one to reserve a device id, and one that specifies how device and
driver work. (For examples, look at the proposed device types that have
been posted to the virtualization lists, e.g. virtio-crypto or
virtio-sdm). You just need to be patient, we're currently a bit
stalled...