[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718021809.GA6310@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:18:09 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Franck Bui <fbui@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v4 2/2] printk: Add kernel parameter to control writes
to /dev/kmsg
On 07/17/16 at 07:40am, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 06:44:25PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Mis-ratelimit cause critical userspace messages being lost, that is worse
>
> The current setting is quite generous so that all critical messages
> should land in dmesg. Besides, we don't ratelimit during boot. The idea
> is that userspace should switch to a different logging facility once the
> system is up... which userspace does reportedly.
I would say avoiding ratelimit during boot make no much sense. Userspace can not
write to /dev/kmsg when system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING because init process
has not run yet.
>
> IOW, /dev/kmsg should handle a relatively big logging amount without
> ratelimiting.
>
> > than use off as default. Suppose we turn off devkmsg by default distributions
> > can still turn on it with sysctl and for us who do not want the flooding we can
> > use printk.devkmsg=off in kernel cmdline to override it.
>
> That part I cannot parse.
I do not understand, care to elaborate a bit?
Let me explain my comments, I means to set printk.devkmsg=off by default,
userspace can set it to on by sysctl. User can provide kernel cmdline
printk.devkmsg=off if he/she want.
Or set printk.devkmsg=on by default to avoid break userspace, it is also fine.
>
> > Of course if we turn off it by default we can print a warning to alert user.
> >
> > BTW, for userspace messages maybe they should not go to same log buffer, maybe
> > a separate log buffer for /dev/msg will be better.
>
> See above.
>
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists