lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718112757.GG22671@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:27:57 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] mm, page_alloc: set alloc_flags only once in slowpath

On Mon 18-07-16 13:22:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> In __alloc_pages_slowpath(), alloc_flags doesn't change after it's initialized,
> so move the initialization above the retry: label. Also make the comment above
> the initialization more descriptive.
> 
> The only exception in the alloc_flags being constant is ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS,
> which may change due to TIF_MEMDIE being set on the allocating thread. We can
> fix this, and make the code simpler and a bit more effective at the same time,
> by moving the part that determines ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS from
> gfp_to_alloc_flags() to gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(). This means we don't have to
> mask out ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS in numerous places in __alloc_pages_slowpath()
> anymore. The only two tests for the flag can instead call
> gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

I've already acked this one AFAIR. But anyway I still agree with this
change
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 571aca8c637a..eb1968a1041e 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3119,8 +3119,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	 */
>  	count_vm_event(COMPACTSTALL);
>  
> -	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order,
> -					alloc_flags & ~ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac);
> +	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac);
>  
>  	if (page) {
>  		struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
> @@ -3288,8 +3287,7 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  retry:
> -	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order,
> -					alloc_flags & ~ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac);
> +	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If an allocation failed after direct reclaim, it could be because
> @@ -3351,16 +3349,6 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	} else if (unlikely(rt_task(current)) && !in_interrupt())
>  		alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
>  
> -	if (likely(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))) {
> -		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_MEMALLOC)
> -			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
> -		else if (in_serving_softirq() && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> -			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
> -		else if (!in_interrupt() &&
> -				((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
> -				 unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))))
> -			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS;
> -	}
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
>  	if (gfpflags_to_migratetype(gfp_mask) == MIGRATE_MOVABLE)
>  		alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CMA;
> @@ -3370,7 +3358,19 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  
>  bool gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  {
> -	return !!(gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask) & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS);
> +	if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_MEMALLOC)
> +		return true;
> +	if (in_serving_softirq() && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC))
> +		return true;
> +	if (!in_interrupt() &&
> +			((current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) ||
> +			 unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  static inline bool is_thp_gfp_mask(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> @@ -3534,36 +3534,36 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  				(__GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM)))
>  		gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_ATOMIC;
>  
> -retry:
> -	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
> -		wake_all_kswapds(order, ac);
> -
>  	/*
> -	 * OK, we're below the kswapd watermark and have kicked background
> -	 * reclaim. Now things get more complex, so set up alloc_flags according
> -	 * to how we want to proceed.
> +	 * The fast path uses conservative alloc_flags to succeed only until
> +	 * kswapd needs to be woken up, and to avoid the cost of setting up
> +	 * alloc_flags precisely. So we do that now.
>  	 */
>  	alloc_flags = gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_mask);
>  
> +retry:
> +	if (gfp_mask & __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
> +		wake_all_kswapds(order, ac);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Reset the zonelist iterators if memory policies can be ignored.
>  	 * These allocations are high priority and system rather than user
>  	 * orientated.
>  	 */
> -	if ((alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS) || !(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET)) {
> +	if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) || gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask)) {
>  		ac->zonelist = node_zonelist(numa_node_id(), gfp_mask);
>  		ac->preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac->zonelist,
>  					ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* This is the last chance, in general, before the goto nopage. */
> -	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order,
> -				alloc_flags & ~ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac);
> +	page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac);
>  	if (page)
>  		goto got_pg;
>  
>  	/* Allocate without watermarks if the context allows */
> -	if (alloc_flags & ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS) {
> +	if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(gfp_mask)) {
> +
>  		page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask, order,
>  						ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS, ac);
>  		if (page)
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ