[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160718184712.4ad7ce58@endymion>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:47:12 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] i2c-smbus: add SMBus Host Notify support
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:59:02 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jul 18 2016 or thereabouts, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > You provide stubs for SMBus Host Notify support if CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS is
> > not selected. There are no such stubs for SMBus Alert support, for which
> > I assumed drivers would select I2C_SMBUS if they have support. Which is
> > what you are actually doing for i2c-i801 in a latter patch.
> >
> > Is there any reason for this difference? For consistency I'd rather
> > provide stubs for all or none. My preference being for none, unless you
> > have a use case which requires them.
>
> Looks like you are right. There is no need for the stubs and they can be
> dropped. I think I had them in the first place for a previous
> implementation, and they just stayed here.
>
> Given that you already sent a few cleanup patches, do you want to send
> this fix also, or do you expect me to send it? (I don't think there will
> be a conflict, so either is fine).
I can do it, I just wanted to make sure it was OK with you first.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists