[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83c60af8-ad2a-d351-eace-82e653183521@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:23:21 -0400
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
jcm@...hat.com, eric.auger@...hat.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
agross@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 4/9] vfio: platform: add support for ACPI probe
On 7/18/2016 1:32 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The implementation looks pretty fixed, it seems like a lot would break
> if that were changed, so the callers of the function would need to be
> updated, including this one. The ternary below is already paranoid
> enough to handle an API change, but if you want to add one more level
> of paranoia, you could use WARN_ON(!vdev->acpihid) to make it user
> visible. It could still be done as:
>
> return WARN_ON(!vdev->acpihid) ? -ENOENT : 0;
OK. I'm adding this and will post a new version after testing.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists