[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160719062036.GA22854@krava>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:20:36 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
hekuang@...wei.com, jolsa@...nel.org, kan.liang@...el.com,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, wangnan0@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 3/4] perf: util: only open events on CPUs an evsel permits
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 07:46:04PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:32:59PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:08:12AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > In systems with heterogeneous CPU PMUs, it's possible for each evsel to
> > > cover a distinct set of CPUs, and hence the cpu_map associated with each
> > > evsel may have a distinct idx<->id mapping. Any of these may be distinct from
> > > the evlist's cpu map.
> > >
> > > Events can be tied to the same fd so long as they use the same per-cpu
> > > ringbuffer (i.e. so long as they are on the same CPU). To acquire the
> > > correct FDs, we must compare the Linux logical IDs rather than the evsel
> > > or evlist indices.
> > >
> > > This path adds logic to perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel to handle this,
> > > translating IDs as required. As PMUs may cover a subset of CPUs from the
> > > evlist, we skip the CPUs a PMU cannot handle.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
> > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
> Applied the first two, this one is not applying, please check my
> perf/core branch, what is there should soon be pushed to Ingo, so
> tip/perf/core may be ok too.
ouch, forgot to mentioned that.. 3rd one did not apply because
of the backward maps we just merged in, I changed it for my review,
but it needs repost
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists