[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACna6ry6QgrbUoHuJacmr1EhHZyrwqsXfr51gENvY-0zM9L+3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:11:11 +0200
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next
tree
On 19 July 2016 at 09:09, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> writes:
>
>> On 19 July 2016 at 08:30, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
>>>
>>>> After merging the wireless-drivers-next tree, today's linux-next build
>>>> (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>>>
>>>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c: In function 'bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe':
>>>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_cache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> b47s->window = ioremap_cache(res->start, resource_size(res));
>>>> ^
>>>> drivers/mtd/devices/bcm47xxsflash.c:299:15: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>>>> b47s->window = ioremap_cache(res->start, resource_size(res));
>>>> ^
>>>>
>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>
>>>> 57d8f7dd2132 ("bcma: allow enabling serial flash support on non-MIPS SoCs")
>>>>
>>>> I have reverted that commit for today.
>>>
>>> Thanks, kbuild bot also notified about this.
>>>
>>> Rafał, as the merge window is getting really close I would like to
>>> revert this for now and we can reapply it once we the problem is fully
>>> solved. And we can use my pending branch for build testing the patch
>>> with kbuild bot. What do you think?
>>
>> The simplest fix sounds pretty much as simple as the revert.
>
> The problem is that I don't have much time, I need to send the pull
> request to Dave within next few days. The fix might create other
> problems so I'm not enthusiastic about iterating with this patch at the
> moment. I think it can wait for 4.9.
I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
still prefer to revert my commit, go ahead.
--
Rafał
Powered by blists - more mailing lists