lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Jul 2016 10:32:17 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc:	lukasz.odzioba@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Is: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c:
 flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree?
 Was:[osstest-admin@...project.org: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection]
 complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd]

[CCing Sasha]

On Mon 18-07-16 11:30:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey Lukasz,
> 
> We found that your patch in the automated Xen test-case ends up
> OOMing the box when trying to install guests. This worked prior
> to your patch.
> 
> See serial log:
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97597/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-pinot0.log
> 
> Would it be OK to revert this patch from the stable trees?

The fix up is trivial so I believe it would be better to apply the
follow up fix
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160714175521.3675e3d6@gandalf.local.home
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ