linux-kernel - Re: Is: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c: flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree? Was:[osstest-admin@...project.org: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection] complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:23:15 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@...wrt.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	lukasz.odzioba@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Is: Revert c5ad33184354260be6d05de57e46a5498692f6d6 "mm/swap.c:
 flush lru pvecs on compound page arrival" from stable tree?
 Was:[osstest-admin@...project.org: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 bisection]
 complete test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd]

On Tue 19-07-16 10:35:09, Sebastian Gottschall wrote:
> No such Message-ID known.

Ups, sorry about that. I didn't know that the stable tree is not
archived via lkml.kernel.org. Here is the link
http://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg138760.html
 
> Am 19.07.2016 um 10:32 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> > [CCing Sasha]
> > 
> > On Mon 18-07-16 11:30:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Hey Lukasz,
> > > 
> > > We found that your patch in the automated Xen test-case ends up
> > > OOMing the box when trying to install guests. This worked prior
> > > to your patch.
> > > 
> > > See serial log:
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/97597/test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd/serial-pinot0.log
> > > 
> > > Would it be OK to revert this patch from the stable trees?
> > The fix up is trivial so I believe it would be better to apply the
> > follow up fix
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160714175521.3675e3d6@gandalf.local.home
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs