[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFo0438H8odWks6HeD6E64+oyXYMHESv=pxqQyJe_9oaWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:31:35 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed
mode switch
On 18 July 2016 at 15:38, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 07/18/2016 03:50 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 16 July 2016 at 00:10, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Chaotian Jing
>>> <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com> wrote:
>>>> Per JEDEC spec, it is not recommended to use CMD13 to get card status
>>>> after speed mode switch. below are two reason about this:
>>>> 1. CMD13 cannot be guaranteed due to the asynchronous operation.
>>>> Therefore it is not recommended to use CMD13 to check busy completion
>>>> of the timing change indication.
>>>> 2. After switch to HS200, CMD13 will get response of 0x800, and even the
>>>> busy signal gets de-asserted, the response of CMD13 is aslo 0x800.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>> [..]
>>>> @@ -1274,20 +1254,18 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
>>>> err = __mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>>> EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, val,
>>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time,
>>>> - true, send_status, true);
>>>> + true, false, true);
>>>> if (err)
>>>> goto err;
>>>> old_timing = host->ios.timing;
>>>> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200);
>>>> - if (!send_status) {
>>>> - err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>> - /*
>>>> - * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>> - * it is a switch error.
>>>> - */
>>>> - if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>> - mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>> - }
>>>> + err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>> + * it is a switch error.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>> + mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>
>>> Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but with the move of the call of
>>> mmc_switch_status() to after mmc_set_timing() we get following error
>>> with sdhci-msm:
>>
>> Thanks for reporting!
>>
>>>
>>> mmc0: mmc_select_hs200 failed, error -110
>>> mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
>>> mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
>>> sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
>>> sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00002e02
>>> sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Present: 0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
>>> sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Caps: 0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x00008007
>>> sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
>>> sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
>>> sdhci: ===========================================
>>>
>>> But I if I understand the commit correctly this is the intention of
>>> the patch (not the error, but the move).
>>
>> I tried dropping this change from my next branch, but there are some
>> more changes on top that prevents a "clean" drop. It's certainly
>> doable, but perhaps we can try to narrow down the problem to see if
>> this could/should be fixed in the sdhci msm driver instead!?
>
> Yes, i am working on it. Seems that if we just ignore the -ETIMEDOUT
> returned by mmc_switch_status() everything works as before. Currently
> i am expecting more information about this controller specifics, in
> order to understand if this could be fixed with a change in the driver
> only.
Thanks for looking into this!
>
>>
>> I also noticed that below submitted change, which *isn't* applied for
>> next, might be related.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9197881/
>>
>
> It is not related to this issue, but it is good to have when this is
> resolved, otherwise we will see the dumpregs output (pr_err now),
> when controller is initialized without a card in the SD slot.
Okay, thanks for clarifying. Although, I need an ack from Adrian
before I apply it.
>
> Thanks,
> Georgi
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists