[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2710890.mOpJ0mpNYq@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:55:08 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the i2c tree
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 05:48:07 AM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > Well, not knowing much about ACPI, I just need the conflict resolution
> > > for my latest i2c/for-next and your above branch. If you want to do it,
> > > fine with me. But maybe Jarkko will be back to office on Monday, too.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't see how these branches can be merged in a sensible
> > way without adding too much new code into the merge itself.
> >
> > Something needs to be dropped and then rebased and applied again.
>
> Okay, I'll drop the I2C parts. Next to the core parts which I will drop,
> there was also a driver patch making use of the core changes for which I
> requested some updates. Since those did not happen yet (Jarkko on
> holiday?), the core patches alone are not important anyhow.
Thanks a lot!
> Thanks for looking into it!
No problem.
Thanks,
Rafael
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists