lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 13:43:26 +0000 From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> CC: "hannes@...essinduktion.org" <hannes@...essinduktion.org>, "andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>, "fw@...len.de" <fw@...len.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "kuznet@....inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, "jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>, "yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, "kaber@...sh.net" <kaber@...sh.net>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>, "viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, "gorcunov@...nvz.org" <gorcunov@...nvz.org>, "john.stultz@...aro.org" <john.stultz@...aro.org>, "aduyck@...antis.com" <aduyck@...antis.com>, "ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>, "decot@...glers.com" <decot@...glers.com>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy > > Yes, rtnl will bring some overheads. But the configuration is one time > > thing for application or socket. It only happens on receiving first > > packet. > > Thanks for destroying our connection rates. > > This kind of overhead is simply unacceptable. If so, I think I can make the configuration asynchronized for next version. The connection rate should not be destroyed. Thanks, Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists