[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160719181329.GH3078@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:13:29 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/18] cgroup_pids: track maximum pids
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:59:18PM +0000, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> With the example systemd-timesyncd case, I was only getting 1 as the
> highwatermark, but there were already two tasks.
Can you please find out why that is so? Given that that's where we
charge pid usage, it doesn't make sense to me that you're getting
lower numbers than actual usage there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists