[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160720042525.GA31927@d830.WORKGROUP>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:25:37 -0700
From: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
To: jic23@...nel.org
Cc: knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iio: accel: bma180: use iio helper function to guarantee
direct mode
Replace the code that guarantees the device stays in direct mode
with iio_device_claim_direct_mode() which does same.
Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
---
Peter: I was not clear if we want to keep the data->mutex lock
in addition to claiming direct mode. I see that lock assuring
exclusivity amongst a few other tasks in the driver. Let me
know if this needs both locks. Thanks!
drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
index e3f88ba..ce5a476 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
@@ -469,13 +469,12 @@ static int bma180_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
switch (mask) {
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
- mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
- if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev)) {
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
- return -EBUSY;
- }
+ ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = bma180_get_data_reg(data, chan->scan_index);
- mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
+ iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
*val = sign_extend32(ret >> chan->scan_type.shift,
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists