[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160720084403.0a6e185b@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:44:03 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: nand: Error out if cmd_ctrl() is missing
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:33:57 -0700
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com> wrote:
> If no user specified chip->select_chip() function is provided, code in
> nand_base.c will automatically set this hook to nand_select_chip(),
> which in turn depends on chip->cmd_ctrl() hook being valid. Not
> providing both of those functions in NAND controller driver (for example
> by mistake) will result in a bit cryptic segfault. Same is true for
> chip->cmdfunc().
>
> To avoid the above scenario change the prototype of nand_set_defaults()
> to return error code, all the callers to check for it and error out if
> cmd_ctrl() is not provided.
>
> Suggested-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index ce7b2ca..bee480f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -3114,22 +3114,30 @@ static void nand_shutdown(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> }
>
> /* Set default functions */
> -static void nand_set_defaults(struct nand_chip *chip, int busw)
> +static int nand_set_defaults(struct nand_chip *chip, int busw)
> {
> /* check for proper chip_delay setup, set 20us if not */
> if (!chip->chip_delay)
> chip->chip_delay = 20;
>
> /* check, if a user supplied command function given */
> - if (chip->cmdfunc == NULL)
> + if (chip->cmdfunc == NULL) {
> + if (!chip->cmd_ctrl)
> + goto no_cmd_ctrl;
> +
> chip->cmdfunc = nand_command;
> + }
>
> /* check, if a user supplied wait function given */
> if (chip->waitfunc == NULL)
> chip->waitfunc = nand_wait;
>
> - if (!chip->select_chip)
> + if (!chip->select_chip) {
> + if (!chip->cmd_ctrl)
> + goto no_cmd_ctrl;
> +
> chip->select_chip = nand_select_chip;
> + }
>
> /* set for ONFI nand */
> if (!chip->onfi_set_features)
> @@ -3161,6 +3169,11 @@ static void nand_set_defaults(struct nand_chip *chip, int busw)
> init_waitqueue_head(&chip->controller->wq);
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +
> +no_cmd_ctrl:
> + pr_err("chip.cmd_ctrl() callback is not provided\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> /* Sanitize ONFI strings so we can safely print them */
> @@ -3878,9 +3891,13 @@ ident_done:
> }
>
> if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_AUTO) {
> + int ret;
> +
> WARN_ON(chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16);
> chip->options |= busw;
> - nand_set_defaults(chip, busw);
> + ret = nand_set_defaults(chip, busw);
I realize this one will actually never fail because it has already been
checked in nand_scan_ident(). Maybe we should leave the
nand_set_defaults() as a void function and check for missing
->cmd_ctrl() directly in nand_scan_ident().
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> } else if (busw != (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)) {
> /*
> * Check, if buswidth is correct. Hardware drivers should set
> @@ -3998,7 +4015,9 @@ int nand_scan_ident(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips,
> mtd->name = dev_name(mtd->dev.parent);
>
> /* Set the default functions */
> - nand_set_defaults(chip, chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16);
> + ret = nand_set_defaults(chip, chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> /* Read the flash type */
> type = nand_get_flash_type(mtd, chip, &nand_maf_id,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists