[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160720065024.GA8428@deathstar>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 01:50:24 -0500
From: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, pali.rohar@...il.com, sre@...nel.org,
ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com, patrikbachan@...il.com,
serge@...lyn.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: tsc200x - Report proper input_dev name
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:31:06AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Passes input_id struct to the the common probe function for the tsc200x drivers
> > instead of just the bustype.
> >
> > This allows for the use of the product variable to set the input_dev->name
> > variable according to the type of touchscreen used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c | 7 ++++++-
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c | 7 ++++++-
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c | 7 ++++---
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.h | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c
> > index 7295c19..6fe55d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2004.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include "tsc200x-core.h"
> >
> > +static const struct input_id tsc2004_input_id = {
> > + .bustype = BUS_I2C,
> > + .product = 2004,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int tsc2004_cmd(struct device *dev, u8 cmd)
> > {
> > u8 tx = TSC200X_CMD | TSC200X_CMD_12BIT | cmd;
> > @@ -42,7 +47,7 @@ static int tsc2004_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> >
> > {
> > - return tsc200x_probe(&i2c->dev, i2c->irq, BUS_I2C,
> > + return tsc200x_probe(&i2c->dev, i2c->irq, &tsc2004_input_id,
> > devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &tsc200x_regmap_config),
> > tsc2004_cmd);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c
> > index b9f593d..f2c5f0e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,11 @@
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > #include "tsc200x-core.h"
> >
> > +static const struct input_id tsc2005_input_id = {
> > + .bustype = BUS_SPI,
> > + .product = 2005,
> > +};
> > +
> > static int tsc2005_cmd(struct device *dev, u8 cmd)
> > {
> > u8 tx = TSC200X_CMD | TSC200X_CMD_12BIT | cmd;
> > @@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ static int tsc2005_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > if (error)
> > return error;
> >
> > - return tsc200x_probe(&spi->dev, spi->irq, BUS_SPI,
> > + return tsc200x_probe(&spi->dev, spi->irq, &tsc2005_input_id,
> > devm_regmap_init_spi(spi, &tsc200x_regmap_config),
> > tsc2005_cmd);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c
> > index 26e81d1b..5e625c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tsc200x-core.c
> > @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static void tsc200x_close(struct input_dev *input)
> > mutex_unlock(&ts->mutex);
> > }
> >
> > -int tsc200x_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, __u16 bustype,
> > +int tsc200x_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, const struct input_id *tsc_id,
> > struct regmap *regmap,
> > int (*tsc200x_cmd)(struct device *dev, u8 cmd))
> > {
> > @@ -547,9 +547,10 @@ int tsc200x_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, __u16 bustype,
> > snprintf(ts->phys, sizeof(ts->phys),
> > "%s/input-ts", dev_name(dev));
> >
> > - input_dev->name = "TSC200X touchscreen";
> > + input_dev->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "TSC%04d touchscreen",
> > + tsc_id->product);
>
> What about:
>
> if (tsc_id->product == 2005)
> input_dev->name = "TSC2005 touchscreen";
> else
> input_dev->name = "TSC200X touchscreen";
>
> We do want to use 'TSC2005' name for TSC2005, because compatibility,
> but you should keep TSC200X.... because compatibility. You don't want
> to break people's setups by going from TSC200X to TSC2004.
By same logic we shouldn't change from TSC200X back to TSC2005 because of
people's possibly new setup in the last 9 months.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists