linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] Provide the interface to validate the proc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <438ce500-ec84-9f55-0422-d033a1f4590f@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:11 +0800
From:	Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	<cl@...ux.com>, <mika.j.penttila@...il.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<yasu.isimatu@...il.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
	<gongzhaogang@...pur.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
	<lenb@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <chen.tang@...ystack.cn>,
	<rafael@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] Provide the interface to validate the proc_id
 which they give



在 2016年07月20日 02:53, Tejun Heo 写道:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:28:08PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> When we want to identify whether the proc_id is unreasonable or not, we
>> can call the "acpi_processor_validate_proc_id" function. It will search
>> in the duplicate IDs. If we find the proc_id in the IDs, we return true
>> to the call function. Conversely, false represents available.
>>
>> When we establish all possible cpuid <-> nodeid mapping, we will use the
>> proc_id from ACPI table.
>>
>> We do validation when we get the proc_id. If the result is true, we will
>> stop the mapping.
> The patch title probably should include "acpi:" header.  I can't tell
> much about the specifics of the acpi changes but I think this is the
> right approach for handling cpu hotplugs.

I will change the title in the next version.

Thanks.
> Thanks.
>