[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc5d5494-9454-86ca-a351-1627ace4e241@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:34:45 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SRAM: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "of_node_put"
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:36:49 +0100
>
> The of_node_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/misc/sram.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> index 736dae7..34287f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
> @@ -326,9 +326,7 @@ static int sram_reserve_regions(struct sram_dev *sram, struct resource *res)
> }
>
> err_chunks:
> - if (child)
> - of_node_put(child);
> -
> + of_node_put(child);
> kfree(rblocks);
>
> return ret;
>
How do you think about to integrate this update suggestion
into another source code repository?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists