lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160720154557.GF4574@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:45:57 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.de>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Christian Brauner <cbrauner@...e.de>, dev@...ncontainers.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] cgroup: allow for unprivileged subtree management

Hello, Aleksa.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 02:18:15AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> +static int cgroup_permission(struct inode *inode, struct kernfs_node *kn,
> +			     int mask)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct cgroup *cgroup;
> +	struct cgroup_namespace *cgroupns;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * First, compute the generic_permission return value. In most cases
> +	 * this will succeed and we can also avoid duplicating this code.
> +	 */
> +
> +	cgroup = kn->priv;
> +	cgroup_get(cgroup);

This pattern which is repated for cgroupns doesn't make sense.  The
code is already assuming that the cgroup is safe to deref.  Getting
its reference doesn't do anything.  Getting it here would only make
sense if the pointer is passed to an asynchronous context.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ