[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLV1Nn7W5DkTG4zwjVCYyT_H9KiWW-_SPEY=ngrDpemHvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:53:09 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Green <andy.green@...aro.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Andy Green <andy@...mcat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/10 v2] ASoC: hisilicon: Add hi6210 i2s audio driver
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:22:43PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>
>> sound/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
>> sound/soc/Makefile | 1 +
>> sound/soc/hisilicon/Kconfig | 5 +
>> sound/soc/hisilicon/Makefile | 1 +
>> sound/soc/hisilicon/hi6210-i2s.c | 678 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> sound/soc/hisilicon/hi6210-i2s.h | 276 ++++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 962 insertions(+)
>
> This is adding a new binding without documenting it and still looks like
> it's far more than an I2S controller.
So I added some binding documentation in the patch that proceeded this...
Oh Crud. I forgot to add the cc list to those files. Sorry for that.
Here they are on the list:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/19/820
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/19/815
As for being more then an i2s controller, I don't have access to the
docs this was written with, so I'm not really sure what I can do to
properly extend this driver beyond acting as an i2s driver. I'll take
a look, but again, my lack of familiarity with ASoC means I may need
some extra guidance. So apologies up front.
>> + switch (params_rate(params)) {
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(cpu_dai->dev, "Bad rate\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> We should tell the user what rate.
>
>> + if (bits == HII2S_BITS_24) {
>> + i2s->bits = 32;
>> + dma_data->addr_width = 3;
>> + } else {
>> + i2s->bits = 16;
>> + dma_data->addr_width = 2;
>> + }
>
> This looks like it should be a switch statement, there's some similar
> stuff for the channels.
So yea, the switch selection above this does the validation and then
I'm just applying the change here.
I can duplicate the switch in both cases, but this seems a little more terse.
>> + _hi6210_i2s_set_fmt(i2s, substream);
>
> Why is this not in line given that this is the only user?
I think it breaks up the function some, but I can move it inline.
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + if (!res) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto err2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i2s->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>
> devm_ioremap_resource() will check the error.
>
>> +err3:
>> + while (--i2s->clocks)
>> + clk_put(i2s->clk[i2s->clocks]);
>> +
>> +err2:
>> + kfree(i2s);
>
> You switched to using devm_ but left the error handling.
Ok, will address.
Thanks for the review and feedback!
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists