[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160720170336.GC21460@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:03:36 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
groeck@...omium.org, smbarber@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tpm: add driver for cr50 on SPI
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:24:11PM -0700, Andrey Pronin wrote:
> The only two things that bother me with such approach are
> (1) whatever names I pick for the new set of functions, they
> will be similar to and thus might be confused with the
> original tpm_tis_read/writeXX;
tpm_tis_helper_read16 ?
> (2) these functions are phy-specific, so possibly it's better
> to create tpm_tis_spi.h and put them there with proper
> name prefixes. And then use in tpm_tis_spi and cr50_spi.
No, they are generic to any tis phy that implements read only through
read_bytes.
(Honestly, I'm not sure we made the best choice here having phy
functions for all the versions, we are not that performance
sensitive, just getting rid of everything but read_bytes from the
phy_ops would probably also be a reasonable thing to do.)
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists