linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87shv4qhyj.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:31:48 +0300
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	"linux-mtd\@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree

Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com> writes:

> Just to head this off, since I noticed it...
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:08:59PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> writes:
>> > I sent a patch seconds ago, you may just take a look at it. If you
>> > still prefer to revert my commit, go ahead.
>> 
>> Ok, let's try your fix. We still have few days. I applied the patch[1]
>> to the pending branch this morning and if I don't see any errors I apply
>> it later tonight and hopefully it will be in tomorrow's linux-next
>> build. Thanks for the quick fix, very much appreciated.
>> 
>> [1] "mtd: add arch dependency for MTD_BCM47XXSFLASH symbol"
>>     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9236053/
>
> I applied a trivial change to this same Kconfig entry:
>
> Subject: mtd: update description of MTD_BCM47XXSFLASH symbol
> http://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git/commitdiff/0a526341fee054c1e2b9f0e4b2b424ae81707d4c
>
> It's a trivial conflict, so should we just let Linus work it out? I can
> note it my MTD pull request, if wireless lands first.

Sounds good to me. Do note that Linus doesn't pull wireless-drivers-next
directly, it goes through net-next. But I'll let Dave also know about
this when I send him the pull request.

-- 
Kalle Valo