linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] driver core: Functional dependencies tracking support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 01:25:53 +0200
From:	Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] driver core: Functional dependencies tracking
 support

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:51:31AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 05:23:40 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:52:42PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 08:24:50 AM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:33:18AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, June 17, 2016 04:07:38 PM Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 02:54:56PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:26:52AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > > > > > > We also have such a functional dependency for Thunderbolt on Macs:
> > > > > > > > On resume from system sleep, the PCIe hotplug ports may not resume
> > > > > > > > before the thunderbolt driver has reestablished the PCI tunnels.
> > > > > > > > Currently this is enforced by quirk_apple_wait_for_thunderbolt()
> > > > > > > > in drivers/pci/quirks.c. It would be good if we could represent
> > > > > > > > this dependency using something like Rafael's approach instead of
> > > > > > > > open coding it, however one detail in Rafael's patches is problematic:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > New links are added by calling device_link_add() which may happen
> > > > > > > > > either before the consumer device is probed or when probing it, in
> > > > > > > > > which case the caller needs to ensure that the driver of the
> > > > > > > > > supplier device is present and functional and the DEVICE_LINK_PROBE_TIME
> > > > > > > > > flag should be passed to device_link_add() to reflect that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The thunderbolt driver cannot call device_link_add() before the
> > > > > > > > PCIe hotplug ports are bound to a driver unless we amend portdrv
> > > > > > > > to return -EPROBE_DEFER for Thunderbolt hotplug ports on Macs
> > > > > > > > if the thunderbolt driver isn't loaded.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It would therefore be beneficial if device_link_add() can be
> > > > > > > > called even *after* the consumer is bound.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I don't quite follow.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Who's the provider and who's the consumer here?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > thunderbolt.ko is the supplier.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But it binds to the children of the ports that are supposed to be its
> > > > > consumers?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why is that even expected to work?
> > > > 
> > > > No, the consumers are aunts (or uncles) of the supplier, if you will. :-)
> > > > 
> > > > The consumers are the hotplug ports (named "Downstream Bridge 1 / 2" in
> > > > the drawing below). The supplier is the NHI:
> > > > 
> > > >       (Root Port) ---- Upstream Bridge --+-- Downstream Bridge 0 ---- NHI
> > > >                                          +-- Downstream Bridge 1 --
> > > >                                          +-- Downstream Bridge 2 --
> > > >                                          ...
> > > > 
> > > > We're calling pci_power_up() and pci_restore_state() from
> > > > pci_pm_resume_noirq(). And that will fail for devices below
> > > > the hotplug ports if the PCI tunnels haven't been re-established
> > > > yet by the NHI.
> > > 
> > > So the NHI is a PCIe device, right?
> > > 
> > > Does the Thunderbolt driver bind to that device?
> > 
> > The NHI is a PCI device but not a bridge. It has class 0x88000.
> > Yes, thunderbolt.ko binds to the NHI.
> > 
> > And portdrv binds to the upstream bridge and downstream bridges.
> > Those have class 0x60400.
> 
> OK, so why would there be a problem with creating links from the NHI
> (producer) to the ports (consumers) before binding portdrv to them?

Because the ordering in which drivers bind isn't guaranteed. At least
on my machine (Debian), portdrv always binds before thunderbolt.

I guess I could amend portdrv to return -EPROBE_DEFER on Macs if
no driver is bound to the NHI. Doesn't feel pretty to me though.

Ultimately this seems to be the same issue as with calling
dev_pm_domain_set() for a bound device. Perhaps device_link_add()
can likewise be allowed if a runtime PM ref is held for the devices
and the call happens under lock_system_sleep()?

Thanks,

Lukas