[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd359a28-7187-cec7-e83b-f7444f1b09a6@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:28:29 +0800
From: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <cl@...ux.com>, <mika.j.penttila@...il.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<yasu.isimatu@...il.com>, <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
<gongzhaogang@...pur.com>, <len.brown@...el.com>,
<lenb@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <chen.tang@...ystack.cn>,
<rafael@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/7] x86, memhp, numa: Online memory-less nodes at boot
time.
在 2016年07月20日 02:50, Tejun Heo 写道:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:28:02PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
>> In this series of patches, we are going to construct cpu <-> node mapping
>> for all possible cpus at boot time, which is a 1-1 mapping. It means the
> 1-1 mapping means that each cpu is mapped to its own private node
> which isn't the case. Just call it a persistent mapping?
Yes, for cpus, each cpu is in a persistent node.
However, the opposite is not that.
I will modify it.
Thanks.
Dou
Powered by blists - more mailing lists