[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721081611.GG10438@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:16:11 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mm: consider per-zone inactive ratio to deactivate
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:10:50PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > @@ -1993,6 +1994,32 @@ static bool inactive_list_is_low(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool file)
> > inactive = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE);
> > active = lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, file * LRU_FILE + LRU_ACTIVE);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * For global reclaim on zone-constrained allocations, it is necessary
> > + * to check if rotations are required for lowmem to be reclaimed. This
> > + * calculates the inactive/active pages available in eligible zones.
> > + */
> > + if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
> > + struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
> > + int zid;
> > +
> > + for (zid = sc->reclaim_idx; zid < MAX_NR_ZONES; zid++) {
>
> Should be changed to "zid = sc->reclaim_idx + 1"
>
You're right, well spotted!
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists