[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160721102356.GB6323@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:23:56 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ipc/msg: Implement lockless pipelined wakeups
* Davidlohr Bueso | 2016-07-20 17:16:12 [-0700]:
>Just as with expunge_all and the E2BIG case, could you remove that explicit
>barrier (B) and just rely on wake_q_add?
Just did. So we have just a smp_rmb() on the reader side and the
comment talks about smb_wmb() and at the spot where we should have the
smb_wmb we have a comment why we don't have one :)
For my understanding: we need that smp_rmb() to ensure that everything
past that cmpxchg() is visible on all other CPUs so we don't have the
wakeup before we r_msg reads != -EAGAIN, right?
>Thanks,
>Davidlohr
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists