[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07484e7c-7d19-465f-04d9-1dbb4899b643@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:49:23 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] coresight: adding sink parameter to function
coresight_build_path()
On 20/07/16 21:38, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Up to now function coresight_build_path() was counting on a sink to
> have been selected (from sysFS) prior to being called. This patch
> adds a string argument so that a sink matching the argument can be
> selected.
>
> static int _coresight_build_path(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> - struct list_head *path)
> + struct list_head *path, const char *sink)
> {
> int i;
> bool found = false;
> struct coresight_node *node;
>
> - /* An activated sink has been found. Enqueue the element */
> - if ((csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK ||
> - csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK) && csdev->activated)
> - goto out;
> + /*
> + * First see if we are dealing with a sink. If we have one check if
> + * it was selected via sysFS or the perf cmd line.
> + */
> + if (csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK ||
> + csdev->type == CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_LINKSINK) {
> + /* Activated via perf cmd line */
> + if (sink && !strcmp(dev_name(&csdev->dev), sink))
> + goto out;
> + /* Activated via sysFS */
> + if (csdev->activated)
When a sink is specified, should we skip an activated sink and continue to
find the specified one ? or at least fail with an error as we may not be using
the sink specified by the user ?
i.e may be :
if (!sink && csdev->activated)
goto out;
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists