[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1469063458-6573-2-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:10:57 +0900
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: byungchul.park@....com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@....net,
mingo@...nel.org
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] Doc/memory-barriers: Fix a typo of example result
An example result for data dependent write has a typo. This commit
fixes the wrong typo.
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 19c8eb6..ba818ec 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ A data-dependency barrier must also order against dependent writes:
The data-dependency barrier must order the read into Q with the store
into *Q. This prohibits this outcome:
- (Q == B) && (B == 4)
+ (Q == &B) && (B == 4)
Please note that this pattern should be rare. After all, the whole point
of dependency ordering is to -prevent- writes to the data structure, along
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists