lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4768363.WDVt5y7Fcm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:43:30 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI / debugger: Add kernel flushing support

On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 06:00:39 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> This patch adds debugger log flushing support in kernel via .ioctl()
> callback. The in-kernel flushing is more efficient, because it reduces
> useless log IOs by bypassing log user_read/kern_write during the flush
> period.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>

Overall, this is an optimization, right?

So is adding a new IOCTL really worth it?

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c     |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/acpi-ioctls.h |   21 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/acpi-ioctls.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> index dee8692..6ac1388 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/circ_buf.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi-ioctls.h>

That should go into the uapi directory at least.

>  #include "internal.h"
>  
>  #define ACPI_AML_BUF_ALIGN	(sizeof (acpi_size))
> @@ -46,6 +47,8 @@
>  #define ACPI_AML_KERN		(ACPI_AML_IN_KERN | ACPI_AML_OUT_KERN)
>  #define ACPI_AML_BUSY		(ACPI_AML_USER | ACPI_AML_KERN)
>  #define ACPI_AML_OPEN		(ACPI_AML_OPENED | ACPI_AML_CLOSED)
> +#define ACPI_AML_FLUSHING_LOG	0x0040 /* flushing log output */
> +#define ACPI_AML_WAITING_CMD	0x0080 /* waiting for cmd input */
>  
>  struct acpi_aml_io {
>  	wait_queue_head_t wait;
> @@ -120,6 +123,20 @@ static inline bool __acpi_aml_busy(void)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool __acpi_aml_waiting_cmd(void)
> +{
> +	if (acpi_aml_io.flags & ACPI_AML_WAITING_CMD)
> +		return true;
> +	return false;

Oh well.

What about

	return !!(acpi_aml_io.flags & ACPI_AML_WAITING_CMD);

> +}
> +
> +static inline bool __acpi_aml_flushing_log(void)
> +{
> +	if (acpi_aml_io.flags & ACPI_AML_FLUSHING_LOG)
> +		return true;
> +	return false;

And analogously here?

> +}
> +
>  static inline bool __acpi_aml_opened(void)
>  {
>  	if (acpi_aml_io.flags & ACPI_AML_OPEN)
> @@ -152,6 +169,26 @@ static bool acpi_aml_busy(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool acpi_aml_waiting_cmd(void)
> +{
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	ret = __acpi_aml_waiting_cmd();
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool acpi_aml_flushing_log(void)
> +{
> +	bool ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	ret = __acpi_aml_flushing_log();
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static bool acpi_aml_used(void)
>  {
>  	bool ret;
> @@ -183,7 +220,8 @@ static bool acpi_aml_kern_writable(void)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
>  	ret = !__acpi_aml_access_ok(ACPI_AML_OUT_KERN) ||
> -	      __acpi_aml_writable(&acpi_aml_io.out_crc, ACPI_AML_OUT_KERN);
> +	      __acpi_aml_writable(&acpi_aml_io.out_crc, ACPI_AML_OUT_KERN) ||
> +	      __acpi_aml_flushing_log();
>  	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -264,6 +302,9 @@ static int acpi_aml_write_kern(const char *buf, int len)
>  	int n;
>  	char *p;
>  
> +	if (acpi_aml_flushing_log())
> +		return len;
> +
>  	ret = acpi_aml_lock_write(crc, ACPI_AML_OUT_KERN);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -458,9 +499,18 @@ static int acpi_aml_wait_command_ready(bool single_step,
>  	else
>  		acpi_os_printf("\n%1c ", ACPI_DEBUGGER_COMMAND_PROMPT);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	acpi_aml_io.flags |= ACPI_AML_WAITING_CMD;
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&acpi_aml_io.wait);
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +
>  	status = acpi_os_get_line(buffer, length, NULL);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	acpi_aml_io.flags &= ~ACPI_AML_WAITING_CMD;
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -593,9 +643,11 @@ static int acpi_aml_read_user(char __user *buf, int len)
>  	smp_rmb();
>  	p = &crc->buf[crc->tail];
>  	n = min(len, circ_count_to_end(crc));
> -	if (copy_to_user(buf, p, n)) {
> -		ret = -EFAULT;
> -		goto out;
> +	if (!acpi_aml_flushing_log()) {
> +		if (copy_to_user(buf, p, n)) {
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	/* sync tail after removing logs */
>  	smp_mb();
> @@ -731,10 +783,48 @@ static unsigned int acpi_aml_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
>  	return masks;
>  }
>  
> +static int acpi_aml_flush(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Discard output buffer and put the driver into a state waiting
> +	 * for the new user input.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	acpi_aml_io.flags |= ACPI_AML_FLUSHING_LOG;
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +
> +	ret = wait_event_interruptible(acpi_aml_io.wait,
> +		acpi_aml_waiting_cmd());
> +	(void)acpi_aml_read_user(NULL, ACPI_AML_BUF_SIZE);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	acpi_aml_io.flags &= ~ACPI_AML_FLUSHING_LOG;
> +	mutex_unlock(&acpi_aml_io.lock);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static long acpi_aml_ioctl(struct file *file,
> +			   unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +	long ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (cmd) {
> +	case ACPI_IOCTL_DEBUGGER_FLUSH:
> +		ret = acpi_aml_flush();
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +	return ret;

	return cmd == ACPI_IOCTL_DEBUGGER_FLUSH ? acpi_aml_flush() : -EINVAL;

> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations acpi_aml_operations = {
>  	.read		= acpi_aml_read,
>  	.write		= acpi_aml_write,
>  	.poll		= acpi_aml_poll,
> +	.unlocked_ioctl	= acpi_aml_ioctl,
>  	.open		= acpi_aml_open,
>  	.release	= acpi_aml_release,
>  	.llseek		= generic_file_llseek,
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi-ioctls.h b/include/linux/acpi-ioctls.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..56b8170
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi-ioctls.h

include/uapi/linux/

> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +/*
> + * ACPI IOCTL collections
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
> + * Authors: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _LINUX_ACPI_IOCTLS_H
> +#define _LINUX_ACPI_IOCTLS_H
> +
> +#include <linux/ioctl.h>
> +
> +#define ACPI_IOCTL_IDENT		'a'
> +
> +#define ACPI_IOCTL_DEBUGGER_FLUSH	_IO(ACPI_IOCTL_IDENT, 0x80)
> +
> +#endif /* _LINUX_ACPI_IOCTLS_H */
> 

Plus patches that change the ABI should be CCed to the ABI review list for,
well, review.

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ