[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5790DCBD.3030903@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:31:25 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
Cc: "jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [patch] Disable PMBus status check for DPS400 PSU controller
On 07/21/2016 07:08 AM, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>>> b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>>> index ba59eae..3d98070 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
>>> @@ -1931,8 +1931,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pmbus_do_probe);
>>> int pmbus_do_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>> {
>>> struct pmbus_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>>> + const struct pmbus_platform_data *pdata =
>>> + dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>>> hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev);
>>> kfree(data->group.attrs);
>>> + kfree(pdata);
>
> So, if I use in allocation
> pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev,
> sizeof(struct pmbus_platform_data),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> I also can drop the above three lines, right?
>
Correct.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists