linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:48:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>
cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] allow BFLT executables on systems with a MMU

On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Greg Ungerer wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> On 21/07/16 05:22, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > This series provides the necessary changes to allow "flat" executable
> > binaries meant for no-MMU systems to actually run on systems with a MMU.
> > Also thrown in are various cleanups to binfmt_flat.c.
> 
> I got to the bottom of why I couldn't run m68k flat binaries on
> an MMU enabled m68k system. I had to fix the regs setup, with the
> patch below. With this I can now run flat binaries on my ColdFire
> MMU enabled system.

Excellent!

> This change is completely independent of your patch series so I'll
> push this separately via the linux-m68k list and my m68knommu git
> tree.

OK.

Who should merge my patch series at this point?


Nicolas