[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1469073492.11841.63.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:58:12 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
Cawa Cheng <cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: set mt8173 dithering function
Hi, Bibby:
On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 11:21 +0800, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
> Hi, CK
>
> I'm appreciate your comments.
>
>
[snip...]
> > >
> > > @@ -469,7 +484,7 @@ void mtk_crtc_ddp_irq(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct mtk_ddp_comp *ovl)
> > > if (state->pending_config) {
> > > mtk_ddp_comp_config(ovl, state->pending_width,
> > > state->pending_height,
> > > - state->pending_vrefresh);
> > > + state->pending_vrefresh, 0);
> >
> > Why set bpc as 0 here? Maybe you have a assumption that OVL don't care
> > the bpc parameter. If one day OVL care it and we do not review here, the
> > bugs happen.
> >
> Pass 0 means don't care, I will modify mtk_od_config() and
> mtk_gamma_config() to filter this condition.
Using 0 as 'don't care' looks tricky. Please add comments to describe
this.
> > >
> > > state->pending_config = false;
> > > }
Regards,
CK
Powered by blists - more mailing lists