lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XeuPEuc9NgZjyRko86ksrBjtAOai4D=nbzvS7KUHJy=sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:59:58 +0930
From:	Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To:	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] pinctrl: Add core pinctrl support for Aspeed SoCs

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
> The Aspeed SoCs provide typically more than 200 pins for GPIO and other
> functions. The signal enabled on a pin is determined on a priority
> basis, where a given pin can provide a number of different signal types.
>
> In addition to the priority levels, the Aspeed pin controllers describe
> the signal active on a pin by compound logical expressions involving
> multiple operators, registers and bits. Some difficulty arises as a
> pin's function bit masks for each priority level are frequently not the
> same (i.e. we cannot just flip a bit to change from a high to low
> priority signal), or even in the same register(s). Some configuration
> bits affect multiple pins, while in other cases the signals for a bus
> must each be enabled individually.
>
> Together, these features give rise to some complexity in the
> implementation. A more complete description of the complexities is
> provided in the associated header file in an attempt to justify the
> approach.
>
> Note that the patch doesn't implement pinctrl/pinmux/pinconf for any
> particular SoC, just adds the framework for defining mux configurations
> for any available functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>

Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>

> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                             |   1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-aspeed/Kconfig            |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                 |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                |   1 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/Kconfig          |   8 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/Makefile         |   3 +
>  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 373 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h | 562 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 950 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/Kconfig
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ