[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160722064101.GW28140@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:41:02 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mach-omap2: remove bogus "or_module" from
rx51-peripherals
Hi,
* Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> [160719 21:17]:
> During unrelated work, attempting to remove an include of the
> linux/module.h in favour of "struct module;" in order to reduce
> header entanglement, we found doing so caused a build failure in
> this file.
We're planning to drop this file after v4.8-rc1 after I've
verified that legacy booting still works at v4.8-rc1.
Are you OK if I pick this patch into my omap-for-v4.8/legacy
branch? Or if you have a minimal immutable branch against v4.7-rc1
with just this patch I can merge it in no problem.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists