linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix reading build id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160722073435.GP5368@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:34:35 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix reading build id

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:53:02AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 09:21:55AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > On 07/21/2016 09:09 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > 
> > > When is_regular_file(name) is called name points to a freshly allocated
> > > and uninitialized chunk of memory, so is_regular_file(name) is usually
> > > false and reading build id is skipped which makes it impossible to
> > > find debug infos when a build id based system is in use.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 403567217d3f ("perf symbols: Do not read symbols/data from device files")
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > See https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9196777/
> 
> Arnaldo, could you please pull this one in?

It is in next as ed7b630b310775f3b6c0b360ede7a12cd8dff6fe. Does "pull
in" mean "send it to Linus for 4.7"? (That's what I'd consider
approriate.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |