[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1469175026-29447-2-git-send-email-weijg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:10:25 +0800
From: Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <kernel@...p.com>, <bhe@...hat.com>,
<xpang@...hat.com>, Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/apic: Update comment about disabling processor focus
Fix references to discarded end_level_ioapic_irq().
Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Jiangang <weijg.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index 0273b652c689..8e25b9b2d351 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -1346,7 +1346,6 @@ void setup_local_APIC(void)
* Actually disabling the focus CPU check just makes the hang less
* frequent as it makes the interrupt distributon model be more
* like LRU than MRU (the short-term load is more even across CPUs).
- * See also the comment in end_level_ioapic_irq(). --macro
*/
/*
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists