[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b580155-d99a-f4a4-ef76-6166b41180aa@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:04:20 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, "mel@....ul.ie" <mel@....ul.ie>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mm/compact: why use low watermark to determine whether compact is
finished instead of use high watermark?
On 07/22/2016 10:56 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I find all the watermarks in mm/compaction.c are low_wmark_pages(),
> so why not use high watermark to determine whether compact is finished?
Why would you use high watermark? Quite the opposite, I want to move
towards min watermark (precisely, the one in alloc_flags which is
usually min) in this series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/24/222
especially:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/24/214
> e.g.
> __alloc_pages_nodemask()
> get_page_from_freelist()
> this is fast path, use use low_wmark_pages() in __zone_watermark_ok()
>
> __alloc_pages_slowpath()
> this is slow path, usually use min_wmark_pages()
Yes, and compaction should be finished when allocation can succeed, so
match __alloc_pages_slowpath().
>
> kswapd
> balance_pgdat()
> use high_wmark_pages() to determine whether zone is balanced
>
> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists