[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH76GKOidxFZ7R1pQZ2W9BRBCxEnLXNHQGrXbAUmouozBUj51Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:10:46 +0200
From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mark.rutland@....com,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] ARM: mvebu: add support for the Armada 395 SoC family
Hi Rob,
2016-07-22 0:16 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Grzegorz Jaszczyk wrote:
>> -compatible = "marvell,a398-db", "marvell,armada398", "marvell,armada390";
>> +compatible = "marvell,a398-db", "marvell,armada398", "marvell,armada395", "marvell,armada390";
>
> If 395 came after 398, then it should come first in the order. This
> implies that marvell,armada398 is a better match than marvell,armada395.
> Or perhaps you shouldn't have both?
>
> Rob
I am not sure if I get your point. The Armada-398 extends the
Armada-395 about 2 additional SATA ports (as you can see in commit
"[PATCH 15/18] ARM: mvebu: a398: update the dtsi about missing
interfaces"). In this example the a398-db board contains the Armada398
SoC, so it is a better match and goes first.
Quite the same is for existing armada-388-db.dts, in which compatible
looks like this:
compatible = "marvell,a385-db", "marvell,armada388",
"marvell,armada385", "marvell,armada380";
In above, Armada-388 also extends the Armada-385 and the order of the
compatible is similar to one from my example.
Thank you,
Grzegorz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists