lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8520D5D51A55D047800579B094147198258BB59B@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:24:22 +0000
From:	Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
To:	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	nofooter <nofooter@...inx.com>, nofooter2 <nofooter2@...inx.com>
Subject: Why does BIOS assign memory to 16 byte BAR

Hi,

I'm observing that on x86 BIOS successfully assigns memory if an End point requests
BAR of size 16byte.

But as per Spec:
The minimum memory address range requested by a BAR is 128 bytes.

Why BIOS is successfully allocating region to 16 byte BAR requests?

Please let me know if my observation is wrong.

Regards,
Bharat



This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ